Posted

Hadoop may be a remarkable new technology, but can it successfully replace an RDBMS? Data warehousing currently governs a wide variety of technical uses and implementations, and though Hadoop may be a versatile tool, it’s designed for a more specific niche. In general, Hadoop is designed to augment existing data warehousing solutions rather than to replace them outright, and when properly deployed it can vastly improve a company’s data management.

The Advantages of Hadoop

Hadoop excels at fast batch processing and is best implemented by companies that need to crunch large amounts of data. It can be seen as a control, through which data flows in and out of your warehouse. As companies increasingly turn to big data processing, Hadoop becomes even more important. There are many companies that have extensive warehouses of data that they have not properly analyze because they simply don’t have the computational time to do so. This data may as well not have been collected at all; most companies today are not using the data that they’ve collected for their big data initiatives. Hadoop is able to losslessly analyze data in a way that makes it easier for it to be warehoused.

The Weaknesses of Hadoop

As a non-relational database, there are some things that Hadoop cannot do. Hadoop cannot, for instance, be able to validate dates, account balances, and other input records, the way that a MySQL or other relational database can. This is a major reason as to why Hadoop is not considered to be a replacement for a traditional relational database; though it can store large volumes of data, it requires another layer to actually interpret and verify this data. Hadoop is able to comb through data quickly, but it does so at the expense of the relationships between this data.

Hadoop also requires fairly extensive resources for some operations, such as joins. But the interesting thing about Hadoop is that many of its weaknesses are lost when it is combined with relational technology such as SQL. Hadoop-on-SQL has become popular for just this reason. By layering Hadoop onto a relational database structure, the weaknesses of both systems are resolved; the system can crunch large amounts of data quickly, but can also relate the data and verify it as needed.

Not only is Hadoop not sufficient for replacing RDBMS, but it’s not what it truly is meant to do. Hadoop is designed to make it easier to use a traditional, relational database, by speeding up operations that directly relate to large data sets. Though it may have many benefits in raw data fields, Hadoop cannot (and usually has not) replace a data warehouse. When mixed with relational databases. however, it creates a powerful and versatile solution.

Are you interested in data science? Businesses today are constantly on the look out for data scientists. Whether you’re a new graduate or an accomplished professional, Software Specialists has an extensive list of job openings in the area of data, data warehousing, and database management.